Often the best flame retardant cables are halogenated as a result of each the insulation and outer Jacket are flame retardant but when we want Halogen Free cables we find it is often only the outer jacket which is flame retardant and the inner insulation is not.
This has significance as a result of whereas cables with a flame retardant outer jacket will usually move flame retardance checks with exterior flame, the same cables when subjected to high overload or prolonged brief circuits have proved in college checks to be highly flammable and can even start a fire. This effect is understood and printed (8th International Conference on Insulated Power Cables (Jicable’11 – June 2011) held in Versailles, France) so it is perhaps surprising that there are not any widespread check protocols for this seemingly widespread occasion and one cited by each authorities and media as cause of building fires.
Further, in Flame Retardant test methods such as IEC60332 parts 1 & 3 which make use of an external flame supply, the cable samples are not pre-conditioned to normal working temperature but examined at room temperature. This oversight is important especially for energy circuits as a result of the temperature index of the cable (the temperature at which the cable materials will self-support combustion in normal air) might be significantly affected by its beginning temperature i.e.: The hotter the cable is, the more easily it will propagate fireplace.
It would appear that a need exists to re-evaluate current cable flame retardance check methods as these are commonly understood by consultants and shoppers alike to provide a reliable indication of a cables ability to retard the propagation of fire.
If we can’t trust the Standards what can we do?

In the USA many building requirements don’t require halogen free cables. Certainly this is not as a result of Americans aren’t wisely knowledgeable of the risks; somewhat the method taken is that: “It is best to have extremely flame retardant cables which don’t propagate fireplace than minimally flame retardant cables which may unfold a fire” – (a small fireplace with some halogen could also be higher than a big fireplace without halogens). One of one of the best ways to make a cable insulation and cable jacket highly flame retardant is by using halogens.
Europe and lots of international locations around the world undertake a unique mentality: Halogen Free and Flame Retardant. Whilst this is an admirable mandate the reality is rather completely different: Flame propagation checks for cables as adopted in UK and Europe can arguably be stated to be less stringent than some of the flame propagation exams for cables in USA leading to the conclusion that common exams in UK and Europe might merely be tests the cables can cross rather than tests the cables should pass.
Conclusion

For most versatile polymeric cables the selection remains right now between high flame propagation efficiency with halogens or lowered flame propagation efficiency without halogens.
Enclosing cables in steel conduit will reduce propagation on the level of fire but hydrocarbon primarily based combustion gasses from decomposing polymers are probably propagate through the conduits to switchboards, distribution boards and junction packing containers in different parts of the building. Any spark such because the opening or closing of circuit breakers, or contactors is prone to ignite the combustible gasses leading to explosion and spreading the fire to a different location.
While MICC (Mineral Insulated Metal Sheathed) cables would provide a solution, there may be usually no singe good answer for every installation so designers want to evaluate the required performance on a “project-by-project” basis to determine which expertise is optimal.
The major significance of fireplace load

Inside all buildings and projects electrical cables present the connectivity which retains lights on, air-conditioning working and the lifts operating. It powers computer systems, office equipment and provides the connection for our phone and computer systems. Even our cell phones need to connect with wi-fi or GSM antennas that are linked to the telecom network by fiber optic or copper cables. Cables guarantee our safety by connecting

hearth alarms, emergency voice communication, CCTV, smoke shutters, air pressurization followers, emergency lighting, fire sprinkler pumps, smoke and warmth detectors, and so many other features of a modern Building Management System.
Where public security is necessary we regularly request cables to have added safety features similar to flame retardance to ensure the cables don’t easily unfold fire, circuit integrity throughout fireplace in order that important fire-fighting and life safety tools maintain working. Sometimes we may recognize that the combustion of electric cables produces smoke and this might be poisonous so we name for cables to be Low Smoke and Halogen Free. Logically and intuitively we predict that by requesting these special properties the cables we buy and set up will be safer

Because cables are put in by many alternative trades for different purposes and are largely hidden or embedded in our constructions, what is usually not realized is that the various miles of cables and tons of plastic polymers which make up the cables can symbolize one of many biggest fire loads in the constructing. This level is actually worth considering more about.
PVC, XLPE, EPR, CSP, LSOH (Low Smoke Zero Halogen) and even HFFR (Halogen Free Flame Retardant) cable materials are principally based on hydrocarbon polymers. These base supplies usually are not typically flame retardant and naturally have a excessive fireplace load. Cable manufacturers make them flame retardant by adding compounds and chemical substances. Certainly this improves the volatility of burning however the fuel content of the bottom polymers stays.
Tables 1 and a pair of above evaluate the fireplace load in MJ/Kg for frequent cable insulating supplies towards some common fuels. The Heat Release Rate and volatility in air for these materials will differ however the fuel added to a fireplace per kilogram and the consequential quantity of warmth generated and oxygen consumed is relative.
The quantity in kilometers and tons of cables put in in our buildings and the associated fire load of the insulations is considerable. This is particularly essential in initiatives with lengthy egress occasions like high rise, public buildings, tunnels and underground environments, airports, hospitals and so forth.
When considering fireplace safety we must first perceive crucial factors. Fire specialists tell us most fireplace associated deaths in buildings are caused by smoke inhalation, temperature rise and oxygen depletion or by trauma attributable to leaping in making an attempt to flee these effects.
Smoke

The first and most important side of smoke is how much smoke? Typically the bigger the hearth the more smoke is generated so anything we can do to cut back the spread of fire may even correspondingly cut back the quantity of smoke.
Smoke will include particulates of carbon, ash and different solids, liquids and gasses, many are toxic and combustible. In particular, fires in confined areas like buildings, tunnels and underground environments cause oxygen ranges to drop, this contributes to incomplete burning and smoldering which produces increased amounts of smoke and toxic byproducts together with CO and CO2. Presence of halogenated materials will release poisonous Halides like Hydrogen Chloride together with many different poisonous and flammable gasses within the smoke.
For this cause frequent smoke exams performed on cable insulation materials in massive 3 meter3 chambers with plenty of air can present misleading smoke figures as a outcome of full burning will usually release considerably less smoke than partial incomplete burning which is likely in apply. Simply specifying IEC 61034 with an outlined obscuration value then thinking it will present a low smoke setting throughout fireplace may unfortunately be little of assist for the individuals actually concerned.
Halogens, Toxicity, Fuel Element, Oxygen Depletion and Temperature Rise

It is regarding that Europe and different nations undertake the idea of halogen free supplies with out properly addressing the subject of toxicity. Halogens released throughout combustion are extremely toxic however so too is carbon monoxide and this isn’t a halogen fuel. It is frequent to name for halogen free cables and then permit the use of Polyethylene as a outcome of it’s halogen free. Burning Polyethylene (which can be seen from the table above has the best MJ gas load per Kg of all insulations) will generate almost three occasions extra heat than an equivalent PVC cable. digital pressure gauge is that burning polyethylene won’t solely generate virtually three occasions extra warmth but in addition devour nearly three instances extra oxygen and produce considerably more carbon monoxide. Given carbon monoxide is responsible for most toxicity deaths in fires this example is at finest alarming!

The fuel components shown in the table above indicate the amount of warmth which shall be generated by burning 1kg of the common cable insulations tabled. Certainly this heat will speed up the burning of other adjacent materials and will help spread the hearth in a constructing but importantly, to find a way to generate the heat vitality, oxygen must be consumed. เพรสเชอร์เกจ of combustion the more oxygen is needed, so by choosing insulations with high gas components is including considerably to a minimum of 4 of the first dangers of fires: Temperature Rise, Oxygen Depletion, Flame Spread and Carbon Monoxide Release.
Perhaps it’s best to install polymeric cables inside metal conduits. This will certainly help flame spread and decrease smoke because inside the conduit oxygen is restricted; nonetheless this isn’t a solution. As mentioned previously, lots of the gasses from the decomposing polymeric insulations contained in the conduits are highly flammable and poisonous. These gases will migrate alongside the conduits to junction boxes, switch panels, distribution boards, motor management centers, lamps, switches, etc. On getting into the gases can ignite or explode with any arcing such because the make/break of a circuit breaker, contactor, swap or relay inflicting the fireplace to unfold to another location.
Conclusion

The popularity of “Halogen Free” whereas ignoring the other toxic parts of fireplace is a transparent admission we don’t perceive the topic nicely nor can we simply outline the dangers of mixed toxic elements or human physiological response to them. It is essential however, that we do not continue to design with solely half an understanding of the problem. While no perfect resolution exists for natural primarily based cables, we will certainly reduce these critically necessary effects of fire danger:
One possibility maybe to choose cable insulations and jacket materials which are halogen free and have a low gas factor, then set up them in metal conduit or maybe the American method is best: to use highly halogenated insulations so that in case of fireside any flame spread is minimized.
For most power, management, communication and knowledge circuits there’s one complete answer obtainable for all the problems raised on this paper. It is an answer which has been used reliably for over 80 years. MICC cables can provide a total and complete answer to all the problems associated with the hearth safety of natural polymer cables.
The copper jacket, magnesium oxide insulation and copper conductors of MICC make sure the cable is successfully fire proof. MICC cables haven’t any organic content material so simply can not propagate flame or generate any smoke. The zero gasoline load ensures no warmth is added and no oxygen is consumed.
Being inorganic MICC cables cannot generate any halogen or toxic gasses in any respect including CO.
Unfortunately many common cable fire check strategies used at present could inadvertently mislead people into believing the polymeric versatile cable merchandise they purchase and use will carry out as anticipated in all hearth conditions. As outlined on this paper, sadly this will not be appropriate.
For pressure gauge , go to www.temperature-house.com

Share